GASP v. Mecklenburg County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
Plaintiffs assign as error the dismissal of their complaint pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to relief pursuant to G.S. 168-1, et seq., since the members of their class are handicapped persons who are denied access to public buildings and facilities because of the presence of tobacco smoke. Since the trial court reserved ruling on the class certification, we will assume for purposes of this discussion that the class of plaintiffs was properly constituted and certified by the court.
The test on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is whether the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hiram B. Ely v. Richard W. Velde, Associate Administrator, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Natural Resources Defense Council, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Federal Employees for Non-Smokers' Rights v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Alltop v. JC PENNEY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Gasper v. Louisiana Stadium & Exposition DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- Hodges v. WellonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mary Ellen Byrne v. Board of Education, School of West Allis-West MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Tudyman v. United AirlinesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Gordon v. Raven Systems & Research, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Peck v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Lyons v. Heritage House Restaurants, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.