Legal Opinion
Peck v. Department of Human Rights
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 10, 1992No. 2-91-1134PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward
Petitioner, James L. Peck, pro se, petitions this court for review of the order of the Human Rights Commission dismissing his complaint against respondent TAD Technical Services Corporation for lack of substantial evidence. Petitioner’s brief lists a number of issues which can be summarized as contentions that the commission erred in finding a lack of substantial evidence to support his complaints of handicap discrimination and retaliation.
Petitioner is an electronic technician, who is very sensitive to cigarette smoke. Respondent TAD Technical Services Corporation (TAD) is a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Milan v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Sanders v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marinelli v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Whipple v. Department of Rehabilitation ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Alcequeire v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Stone v. Department of Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Department of Corrections v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.