Legal Opinion

AETNA INC. v. MEDNAX, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02217Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AETNA INC., ET AL : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, : : v. : : MEDNAX, INC. et al : NO. 18-cv-02217-WB Defendants. : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONCERNING DOC. NOS. 56 & 64 I. Doc. No. 56: Plaintiffs’ motion to quash the subpoena to Dr. Makuch. The plaintiffs (referred to collectively as “Aetna”) have filed a motion to suppress or quash a subpoena directed to their expert witness, Dr. Makuch. Doc. No. 56. I have reviewed the parties’ submissions. I have also reviewed in camera the engagement letter concerning Dr. Makuch’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. In re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Bird v. Penn Central Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Financial Guaranty Insurance v. Putnam Advisory Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API