Legal Opinion
National Tea Co. v. McDonough
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1929No. 27,454PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on a contractors’ bond wherein, after a decision favorable to plaintiff, the surety, Western Surety Company, appeals from the order denying its motion for amended findings or a new trial. Its codefendants, Patrick J. McDonough and Frederick A. Hecker, -co-partners doing business as McDonough & Hecker, were its principals in the bond. They do not appeal.
The bond bears date of August 11, 1925. It recites a contract entered into August 8 between plaintiff and McDonough & Hecker, as principals, for the installation by the latter of the plumbing and gas fittings in a building then under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fitger Brewing Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Fitger Brewing Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Johnson v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Church of Immaculate Conception v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Denver Brick & Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Garbush v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Tucker Paving Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- First Church of Christ, Scientist v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941