Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Laurence

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1927No. 25,975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The Union Indemnity Company, being a surety on a bond of defendant Laurence for tbe performance of a building contract with plaintiff, appealed from a judgment.

The bond contains this provision:

“The surety shall he notified in writing of any act on the part of said principal or his or their agents or employees, which may involve a loss for which the said surety is responsible hereunder, immediately after the occurrence of such act shall have come to the knowledge of said owner, or to any representative duly authorized to oversee the performance of said contract; and a registered letter mailed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lakeside Land Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Reilly v. LindenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Fitger Brewing Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Fitger Brewing Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Ceylon Farmers Elevator Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Guaranteed Gravel & Sand Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Odegard v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Rowe v. StufflebeamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. National Exchange Bank of St. Paul v. SolbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API