Legal Opinion
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Archives & Records Administration
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 1, 2017No. 16-5366PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Judicial Watch filed'a Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) request seeking disclosure of “[a]ll versions of indictments against Hillary Rodham, Clinton” arising out of the Independent Counsel’s investigation begun in 1994. Although a great deal of information has been released to the public in connection with the Independent Counsel’s investigation, a draft indictment mentioned, in- a 1999 New York Times article and a book published in 2010 has not. Because a draft indictment implicates serious privacy concerns, Judicial Watch was required to demonstrate “exceptional…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Larson v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on Behalf of Judiciary Committee v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. DOJCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Thomas W. Sikes v. United States Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Ctr. for Pub. Integrity v. U.S. Dep't of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Center for Public Integrity v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Dillon v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.