Legal Opinion

Humane Society of the United States v. Vilsack

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 14, 2015No. 13-5293, 13-5307PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD.

PILLARD, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs, a pork producer named Harvey Dillenburg and two animal welfare organizations who count pork producers among their members, claim that the National Pork Board has misappropriated millions of dollars from a fund for pork promotion into which pork producers are required to pay. The plaintiffs filed suit in federal district court and the court dismissed their claim for a lack of standing. We reverse.

I

The National Pork Board is a quasi-governmental entity responsible for administering a federal regulatory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Chantal Attias v. CareFirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Victor K. Williams v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. Gordon Reid v. Hugh J. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Leatrice Tanner-Brown v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API