Humane Society of the United States v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD.
PILLARD, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs, a pork producer named Harvey Dillenburg and two animal welfare organizations who count pork producers among their members, claim that the National Pork Board has misappropriated millions of dollars from a fund for pork promotion into which pork producers are required to pay. The plaintiffs filed suit in federal district court and the court dismissed their claim for a lack of standing. We reverse.
I
The National Pork Board is a quasi-governmental entity responsible for administering a federal regulatory…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Chantal Attias v. CareFirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Victor K. Williams v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Gordon Reid v. Hugh J. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Leatrice Tanner-Brown v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.