Legal Opinion

United States v. Isaac Monge

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2018No. 16-10458Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Issac Monge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Monge argues that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under United States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We review “de novo whether a district court has jurisdiction to modify an otherwise final sentence.” United States v. Waters, 771 F.3d 679, 680 (9th Cir. 2014) (per curiam). A district court has jurisdiction to modify an imposed sentence where the “defendant .., has been sentenced to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Geary Waters, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-SorianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API