United States v. Geary Waters, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Geary W. Waters appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo whether a district court has jurisdiction to modify an otherwise final sentence. United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730 (9th Cir.2009). We affirm.
Section 3582(c)(2) allows modification of a term of imprisonment when: (1) the sentence is based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission; and (2) such reduction is consistent with applicable…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Raymond Joseph JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Christina Elizabeth ColonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. WessonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Willie DiggsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Franklin ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Hector OrnelasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Thomas KrugerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.