United States v. Antonio Rodriguez-Soriano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
Congress has provided a limited mechanism for defendants to shave time off their sentences when the Sentencing Commission amends the Sentencing Guidelines with retroactive effect. In recent years, the Commission amended the Guidelines to reduce the potential time served by defendants convicted of certain drug crimes. After one of these amendments came into effect, Antonio Rodriguez-Soriano asked the district court to shorten his sentence, but the court declined to do so. We affirm because the district court properly determined that Rodriguez-Soriano’s original…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. D.M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. BestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Christopher OsterlothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. DavenportDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2018
- United States v. Isaac MongeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.