Terrebonne Homecare, Inc. v. SMA Health Plan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The threshold issue in this appeal is whether the artful pleading doctrine maybe invoked to assert federal jurisdiction over a complaint alleging state antitrust law claims. Because plaintiff alleged state law claims in a field that is not completely preempted by federal law, the artful pleading doctrine does not apply. The district court therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and its orders múst be vacated and the case remanded to state court.
I
Appellant, Terrebonne Homecare, Inc. (“THI”), a home health care agency, sued Terrebonne General Medical Center in Louisiana state court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- California v. ARC America Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bernhard v. Whitney National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Surgical Care Center of Hammond, L.C. v. Hospital Service District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Smallwood v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- James Roland v. Jason GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Washington Consulting Group, Inc. v. Raytheon Technical Services Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.