Legal Opinion
James Roland v. Jason Green
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 19, 2012No. 11-10932, 11-11031 and 11-11048PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
This consolidated appeal arises out of an alleged multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by R. Allen Stanford through his various corporate entities. These three cases deal with the scope of the preclusion provision of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (“SLUSA”). That provision states: “No covered class action based upon the statutory or common law of any State or subdivision thereof may be maintained in any State or Federal court by any private party alleging a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Energy Management Services, LLC v. City of AlexandriaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Matthew Mitchell v. Orico BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Spear Marketing, Incorporated v. BancorpSouth BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Samuel Troice v. Proskauer Rose, L.L.P., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.