Legal Opinion
City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided February 22, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 92-G-1614-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GUIN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the above-styled cause are public entities organized and located in Alabama that purchase repackaged chlorine for the treatment of drinking water, sewage, and swimming pools. Defendant chemical com*1509panies either distribute or repackage chlorine1 within the flow of interstate commerce.2 The sale and distribution of chlorine between these buyers and sellers is handled by submission of sealed bids3 or by negotiation of purchase prices with one or more suppliers.
Experts for opposing parties have characterized the chlorine industry as an…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- 1998-2 Trade Cases P 72,307, 12 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 217 City of Tuscaloosa Municipal Utilities Board of Albertville, Auburn Water Works Board Jasper Water Works and Sewer Board, Inc., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. Jones Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Ohio ex rel. Montgomery v. Louis Trauth Dairy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chem.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998