Legal Opinion

In re Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this disciplinary proceeding was admitted to practice in this department on June 29, 1928. Since that time he has been engaged primarily in commercial fields and not in the active practice of law. He is charged with professional misconduct for having been guilty of disgraceful behavior unworthy of a member of the Bar.

The evidence completely substantiates the charges that respondent, although he employed no female help, lured young women to his premises by advertisements for help wanted, sought to elicit from them answers to highly improper questions by giving assurances that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DubinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. In re NicoliniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. In re BivonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Matter of ElkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. In Re the Application for the Discipline of PetersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re TenenbaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API