Legal Opinion
Roth v. District of Columbia Courts
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 22, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-3361(EGS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, three attorneys and one investigator, provide legal and litigation support services for the District of Columbia’s indigent criminal defendants under the Criminal Justice Act, D.C.Code § 11-2601 et seq. (“CJA”). Plaintiffs seek relief under the Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3901 et seq. (“PPA”), for interest on services rendered under the CJA. Defendant, District of Columbia Courts, 1 moves to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(c). Upon…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CareFirst, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Glenn v. FayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Swish Marketing, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Morgan Drexen, Inc. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.