Legal Opinion
Morgan Drexen, Inc. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-1112PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Morgan Drexen, Inc. (“Morgan Drexen”) and Kimberly Pisinski (“Pisinski”) bring this action against Defendant Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”) alleging that Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 5841 et seq.) is unconstitutional as a violation of separation of powers principles. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ [13] Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs’ [15] Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Doe Co. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Morgan Drexen, Inc. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- John Doe Company v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jarkesy v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Fiberlight, LLC v. National Railroad Passenger CorprationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.