Legal Opinion
State v. Brennan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 12, 1965No. File No. CR 1-10293PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The accused was found guilty, after a trial to the court, of violation of the Westport hunting ordinance, which provides as follows: “No firearm shall be discharged within five hundred (500) feet of any building in the hunting district.”
*414The prosecution of the accused was based upon a stipulation of facts and exhibits agreed upon by the state and the counsel for the accused. The facts so stipulated and the information derived from the exhibits may be stated briefly. On December 20, 1963, at approximately 4 p.m., the accused, armed with a shotgun, was hunting waterfowl in tidal waters of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Inhabitants of East-Haven v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Poneleit v. DudasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Shelton v. City of SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Bredice v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Church v. MeekerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaluszka v. East HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
- City of Junction City v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- City of Junction City v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- City of Lyons v. SuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- City of Lyons v. SuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972