Legal Opinion
Kaluszka v. East Hartford
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 22, 1999No. File No. CV97-0573686-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The present action was commenced by service of process on September 2, 1997. As alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff, Michael Kaluszka, is a resident of the town of East Hartford who possesses a valid Connecticut hunting license. The defendants include the town of East Hartford, along with East Hartford Mayor Robert M. DeCrescenzo and East Hartford Chief of Police James Shay (hereinafter collectively town). The plaintiff is seeking a declaratory judgment that § 13-33 of the code of ordinances of the town of East Hartford is invalid to the extent that it regulates hunting, as well as a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Helicopter Associates, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bencivenga v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaluszka v. Town of East HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016