Legal Opinion
Rayfield Martin v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 2, 1969No. 27622_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge:
Rayfield Martin commenced this action under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1964), to obtain judicial review of the determination by the Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare that Martin was not entitled under the Act to either a period of disability or disability insurance benefits. 1 See Social Security Act §§ 216(i), 223, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423 (1964), as amended (Supp. IV, 1969). The Secretary denied Martin’s claim on the grounds that Martin’s “diagnosed impairments, either singularly or in combination, did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Kenneth J. Rome v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lawrence J. Labee v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Roy A. Green v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by38 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bertha M. Bittel v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Charlotte Laffoon v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Ann E. Waters v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.