Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Perales

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1971No. 108PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

402 U.S. 389 (1971)

RICHARDSON, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

v.

PERALES.

No. 108.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 13, 1971

Decided May 3, 1971

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Deputy Solicitor General Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, Assistant Attorney General Gray, Lawrence G. Wallace, Kathryn H. Baldwin, and Michael C. Farrar.

Richard Tinsman, by appointment of the Court, 398 U. S. 902, argued the cause and filed a brief for…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. James Hardy v. Kevin Chappell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. (SS) (CONSENT) Barney v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (SS) (CONSENT) Threlkeld v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (SS) Anderson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (SS) Arana v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API