Legal Opinion

Jones v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2006No. 137A05-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

On 16 December 2005, this Court issued an opinion in this case, concluding “the Court of Appeals correctly held that plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to gross negligence and that defendants were entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.” Jones v. City of Durham, 360 N.C. 81, 90, 622 S.E.2d 596, 603 (2005). Subsequently, on 15 February 2006, this Court allowed plaintiff’s petition to rehear. Jones v. City of Durham, 360 N.C. 367, 629 S.E.2d 611 (2006). This matter initially came to this Court based on a dissenting opinion in the Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Jones v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Jones v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. WillettsDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Jones v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. RippyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Truhan v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Holloway v. N.C. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety/N.C. Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API