Legal Opinion

State v. Coffey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1999No. 97-1027; CA A98424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, assigning error, inter alia, to the trial court’s failure to inquire into and rule on defendant’s request for appointment of new counsel. We conclude that the trial court so erred and reverse and remand for a new trial.

On January 30, 1997, defendant was charged with burglary in the first degree and theft in the second degree in connection with the theft of a VCR from his ex-mother-in-law’s home. At defendant’s arraignment on February 12, 1997, the court appointed counsel. Trial was set for May 8, 1997.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HeapsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. Bargas-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. GrcichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Elkins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API