Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Applied Geographics, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 2, 2004No. 042783BLSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, J.

This matter is before the Court on a motion by the majority shareholder of a closely held corporation seeking an order requiring a shareholders meeting. The statute that gives authority to this Court to act on such a motion is G.L.c. 156D, Sec. 7.03, the new Massachusetts Business Corporation Act,1 which, at the time of the hearing, had been in effect for a little over 11 hours. See Chapter 127 of the Acts of 2003.

This Court is truly writing on a tabula rasa, although some guidance exists in the new law’s helpful commentaries and in analogies to conditions under prior corporate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. S. Solomont & Sons Trust, Inc. v. New England Theatres Operating Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Albert E. Touchet, Inc. v. TouchetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API