Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. Penrod

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1911No. 21,885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Prom Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Calvin S. Penrod, as administrator of the estate of George Grey, deceased, and others against Timothy J. Driscoll and others. Prom a "judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This was an action by appellees against appellants to recover rentals on a gas and oil lease. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1. A demurrer to the complaint for insufficient facts was overruled, and this action of the lower court is first assigned as error. The complaint, omitting formal parts, is as follows: Plaintiffs complain of defendants and say that on January 3, 1902, plaintiffs George Grey, Elizabeth Grey and Rowena Peazel, leased to defendants the following described real estate in Chester township, Wells county, Indiana, to wit: The northeast quarter of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reissner v. OxleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. White v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cravens v. Eagle Cotton Mills Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Crary v. KurtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Pate v. FrenchIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Louisville & Southern Indiana Traction Co. v. LottichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Shedd v. American Maize Products Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Finch v. McClellanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Brumfield, Tr. v. State Ex Rel. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API