Blinson v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
“Today, every state provides tax and other economic incentives as an inducement to local industrial location and expansion.” Walter Hellerstein & Dan T. Coenen, Commerce Clause Restraints on State Business Development Incentives, 81 Cornell L. Rev. 789, 790 (1996). In a reprise of Maready v. City of Winston-Salem, 342 N.C. 708, 467 S.E.2d 615 (1996), plaintiffs challenge incentives — provided by the General Assembly and defendants City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County- — that benefitted defendant Dell, Inc. when it constructed a computer manufacturing facility in Forsyth County.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stanley v. Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Nicholson v. State Education Assistance AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Fuller v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Anderson v. SeaScape at Holden Plantation, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Bigelow v. Sassafras Grove Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Grasinger v. WilliamsNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.