Legal Opinion

Blinson v. State

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 2007No. COA06-1258PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

“Today, every state provides tax and other economic incentives as an inducement to local industrial location and expansion.” Walter Hellerstein & Dan T. Coenen, Commerce Clause Restraints on State Business Development Incentives, 81 Cornell L. Rev. 789, 790 (1996). In a reprise of Maready v. City of Winston-Salem, 342 N.C. 708, 467 S.E.2d 615 (1996), plaintiffs challenge incentives — provided by the General Assembly and defendants City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County- — that benefitted defendant Dell, Inc. when it constructed a computer manufacturing facility in Forsyth County.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Stanley v. Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Nicholson v. State Education Assistance AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Fuller v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Anderson v. SeaScape at Holden Plantation, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Bigelow v. Sassafras Grove Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Grasinger v. WilliamsNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API