Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Goldman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 18, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maximilian Moss, S.

This is a motion by the proponent to vacate the notice of examination served upon him by the objectant and for other appropriate relief. The grounds of the motion are that the examination is not material or necessary, is too broad in scope and time and in effect seeks an accounting as to the decedent’s partnership relationships and businesses conducted by him and his sons including the proponent. Decedent died on May 11, 1956. The propounded instrument is dated October 11, 1948, and leaves his wife, the objectant, a legacy of $2,500 and the income of one third of his estate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of CarllNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of SperryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In re the Estate of GorenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
  4. In re the Probate of the Will of BoyleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of Du BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of EschenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API