Legal Opinion
Horn v. Davis
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1914PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From Malheur: Dalton Biggs, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Bamsey. This is an action by W. T. Horn against Frank Davis, upon a written contract to recover $5,000 alleged to be due the plaintiff. A verdict and a judgment were rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appeals. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eamsey
On the 29th day of October, 1909, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a written contract for the sale of certain real and personal property, of which the following is a copy:
“This agreement, made this 29th day of October, 1909, by and between W. T. Horn of Jordan Valley, Oregon, party of the first part, and Frank Davis, of Ontario, Oregon, party of the second part, witnesseth: That ~W. T. Horn, the party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500) bargains, sells and conveys unto Frank Davis, party of the second part,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foste v. Standard InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Nordholt v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Timson v. Manufacturers Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Talbot v. GarretsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Wallace v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Oregon Bank v. Nautilus Crane & Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Carnahan Mfg. Co. v. Beebe-Bowles Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Pio v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- DENHAM ET UX v. CuddebackOregon Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.