Legal Opinion

Scott v. Kenyon

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1940No. L. A. 17304PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

The above-entitled case was transferred to this court for the reason that the record disclosed that Mr. Justice Griffin, one of the justices who concurred in the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, had previously as a superior court judge ruled upon a demurrer filed in the action when the same was pending in the superior court. Mr. Justice Griffin was thus disqualified from participating in the cause. (Knouse v. Nimocks, 8 Cal. (2d) 482 [66 Pac. (2d) 438].)

From an examination of the evidence and the law applicable thereto we find ourselves in accord with the statement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rideout v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Knouse v. NimocksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Knowles v. YeatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Larson v. LockenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Peterson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wilkinson v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Wilks v. MoutonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API