Legal Opinion
Clements v. HOUSING AUTH. OF BOROUGH OF PRINCETON
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 12, 2007No. Civil Action 06-cv-01640 (FLW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDA L. WOLFSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion of Defendants, Housing Authority of the Borough of Princeton (“HAP”) and Scott Parsons, for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff, Sharon Clements’ claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), Title VII, and New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (“NJLAD”). This Court finds that Plaintiff cannot meet the threshold requirement to bring suit under the ADA, FMLA, and Title VII because the HAP did not employ the requisite number of employees to trigger the applicability of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Hedges v. MuscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Braden v. County of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pawlowski v. ScherbenskeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
- DICKERSON v. NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- POWELL v. VERIZONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- SUNG v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019