Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Watkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1916No. 13051PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Claypool, J., entered November 14, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $4,000, in an action for malpractice.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Action to recover damages for alleged malpractice of a physician in the treatment of an injured shoulder. On a former appeal, Department Two of this court reversed a judgment for plaintiff and remanded the case for a new trial. Hoffman v. Watkins, 78 Wash. 118, 138 Pac. 664.

At both trials it appeared that, on Sunday night, February 3, 1912, plaintiff, a man fifty-four years old, was assaulted on the streets of Aberdeen, knocked down, and stunned and robbed, sustaining a cut over the eye and a severe injury to the right shoulder. At both trials the gravamen of the charge of negligence was the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Taylor v. KiddWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hoffman v. WatkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Miller v. Sisters of St. FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Scribner v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Mott Iron Works v. Metropolitan BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API