Legal Opinion

Bell v. Umstattd

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1966No. 11378PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Justice.

This is a suit for damages brought by Xenia Bell, the appellant here, against Robert G. Umstattd, an anesthesiologist and appellee, for injuries sustained by appellant as a result of appellee’s attempts to insert an endotracheal tube between her vocal cords in order to administer an anesthetic prior to surgery. When appellant rested her case in the trial court, appellee made a motion for an instructed verdict upon the grounds that no competent evidence of any probative force was presented- upon which any findings of negligence or proximate cause could be based. The trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hart v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  4. Porter v. PuryearTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Kaster v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Haddock v. ArnspigerTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. Whitehurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Shirley Karp, Individually, Etc. v. Denton A. Cooley and Domingo S. LiottaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Zamora v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API