Legal Opinion

Hart v. Van Zandt

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1965No. A-10513PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case. Venice E. Hart, as plaintiff, sought by this suit against Dr. I. L. Van Zandt, the defendant, to recover damages for various permanent physical injuries such as sensory losses to his leg and foot and malfunction of elimination organs allegedly resulting from an operation performed on his lower back by defendant and from various acts and omissions on the part of defendant in connection with the post-operative care and treatment of plaintiff. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant filed a motion for peremptory instruction. Upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. BourdonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  4. Ford v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. White v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jelinek v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Webb v. JornsTexas Supreme Court · 1972

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API