Legal Opinion
Erikson v. Frink Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 10, 1926No. 2754PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This ease came on for hearing on the return of a summons to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, as prayed for in the bill filed on November 26, 1926. The defendant appeared specially by counsel for the purpose of pleading to the jurisdiction of the court. Its contentions have been ably presented, orally and on brief.
The plaintiff is a Massachusetts citizen; the defendant is a New York corporation, alleged to have a regular and established place of business in Boston, within this district. The officer’s return shows service upon Daniel Eitts, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bass v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- O'Mara v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Olson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Triplett v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.