Legal Opinion

Escamilla v. Tri-City Metro Drug Task Force

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 4, 2000No. 18369-6-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

999 P.2d 625 (2000)

100 Wash.App. 742

Alfonso ESCAMILLA and Maggie Escamilla, husband and wife, Appellants,

v.

TRI-CITY METRO DRUG TASK FORCE, Respondent.

No. 18369-6-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

May 4, 2000.

Antonio Salazar, Seattle, for Appellants.

Sylvia T. Cornish, Terry J. Bloor, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Kennewick, for Respondent.

BROWN, A.C.J.

The Tri-City Metro Drug Task Force (Metro) seized a vehicle and $27,397 from Alfonso and Maggie Escamilla after Mr. Escamilla was arrested for possessing drugs. At an administrative hearing the property was forfeited to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re One 1970 Chevrolet ChevelleWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Roos v. Snohomish Regional Drug Task ForceWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API