Legal Opinion

Starczewski v. Unigard Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 17, 1991No. 25390-5-IPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webster, A.C.J.

Franciszek and Janina Starczewski own property insured by Unigard Insurance Group that was destroyed by a fire. The Starczewskis, pro se, appeal the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning amounts due under Unigard's policy. Starczewskis assert that the trial judge erred in: (1) refusing to award prejudgment interest from the date of the fire, (2) declining to find that Unigard violated the Consumer Protection Act and award additional sums under the act, (3) valuing the "actual cash value" of the premises at only $50,000 as opposed to $61,000, (4)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. SAFECO INSURANCE CO. OF AM. v. HirschmannWashington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Dombrosky v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Bering Strait School District v. RLI Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API