Legal Opinion

Garcia Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1965No. 69278; protest 59/33275 (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This action is directed against the classification of certain Platyl nylon monofilament fishing line, which was entered for consumption after *421the amendment of paragraph 1313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by Public Law 85-645, 72 Stat. 602 (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 1313), T.D. 54676. The imported merchandise was assessed at 27% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1211 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, by virtue of the similitude…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garcia Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API