Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Gole, Judge:
The factual phase of this case, which will be embodied in discussing the issues instead of outlining the testimony of each witness, individually, is uncontradicted.
Spun nylon yarn was classified by similitude as wool yarn, other than in chief value of Angora rabbit hair, with an assessment of duty at 30 cents per pound and 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1107 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802, and paragraph 1559 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1559). Plaintiff seeks…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Mason v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Roovers Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- British Overseas Airways Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Garcia Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Associated Lace Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.