Ferdie Sievers, Etc. v. Diversified Mortg.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Manoukian, J.:
This is an appeal from the granting of declaratory judgment in favor of respondents. In this action, plaintiff-appellants *813requested the district court to declare that the promissory note entered into between appellants and respondent, Diversified, was usurious and that all interest paid be returned to appellant.1 Appellants also asked for damages for breach of contract.
Two issues are presented for our consideration, namely: (1) Whether the loan transaction was usurious; and (2) Whether respondent breached the contract by failing to comply with release clauses…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bedford v. Eastern Building and Loan Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Fahs v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Kronovet v. LipchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Continental Mortg. Investors v. Sailboat Key, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Key Bank of Alaska v. DonnelsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.