Legal Opinion

Crary v. Djebelli

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 26, 1998No. 24757PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

This case is before us on a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision reported at 321 S.C. 38, 467 S.E.2d 128 (Ct.App.1995). We reverse.

The master-in-equity awarded petitioner Seyed Rassool Djebelli judgment against Crary and Durham under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) 1 based on a finding that they engaged in an unfair and deceptive trade practice that affected the public interest because it had the potential for repetition. R. Michael Crary, Carl M. Durham, and C & A Mortgage Services appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Daisy Outdoor Advertising Co. v. AbbottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. York v. Conway Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Haley Nursery Co., Inc. v. ForrestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Singleton v. Stokes Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Campbell v. Marion County Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Barnacle Broadcasting, Inc. v. Baker Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. DeBondt v. Carlton Motorcars, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  5. RFT Management Company LLC v. John PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API