Legal Opinion

York v. Conway Ford, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 27, 1997No. 24564PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Appellant contends the trial judge erred in denying his motion for a continuance, dismissing a cause of action based on the Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”), and refusing to set aside the jury’s verdict on the remaining causes of action. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

On November 3, 1989, appellant John York purchased a 1988 truck from respondent Conway Ford, Inc., for $5,350.00. Appellant claims prior to purchasing the truck, he was told by Conway Ford that the truck was a “like new” demonstrator and had never been titled to an individual. Almost immediately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Haley Nursery Co., Inc. v. ForrestSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Odom v. WEATHERSBEESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Zaman v. S. C. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Benton v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
  4. Global Protection Corp. v. HalbersbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Crary v. DjebelliSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API