Legal Opinion

Daisy Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Abbott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 1996No. 24463PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This case stems from an ongoing dispute between two outdoor advertisers, Daisy Outdoor Advertising Company (“Daisy”) and Dean Abbott d/b/a Abbott Company Outdoor Advertising (“Abbott”). We granted certiorari to clarify our precedents concerning the public interest requirement for a private cause of action under South Carolina’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”), S.C. Code Ann. § 39-5-20 (1985). The Court of Appeals found that although Abbott presented evidence that Daisy’s practice of blocking Abbott’s billboards had the potential for repetition, Abbott failed to present any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Noack Enterprises, Inc. v. Country Corner Interiors of Hilton Head Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Ardis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. LaMotte v. Punch Line of Columbia, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Havird Oil Company, Incorporated v. Marathon Oil Company, Incorporated, and Emro Marketing Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Singleton v. Stokes Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
  5. Crary v. DjebelliSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API