Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 20, 1950No. 16187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

*327This case arose when the Telephone Company, on November 12, 1947, put into effect a new general rate schedule for the city of Colorado Springs applicable to business and residence telephones and to extensions. This schedule replaced one that had been “substantially unaltered since prior to 1909.” Plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, as subscribers to the telephone service in Colorado Springs, sought an injunction against the company “from charging or collecting rates for local telephone service in excess of the rates in effect prior to November 12, 1947,” as to either…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Loomis v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bennett v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API