Legal Opinion
Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Brannan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 6, 1948No. 32900PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiffs in error, defendants below, prosecute this appeal from a judgment of the district court of Murray county awarded defendant in error, plaintiff below. Several errors are assigned for reversal, but we deem it necessary to consider only the one challenging the right of the court to entertain the action because of the alleged absence of venue in said county.
It is alleged in the petition that the plaintiff is a resident of Love county; that the defendants Thomas E. Nix and Guy G. Jameson are residents of Oklahoma county; that defendant the Sohio Petroleum Company is a nonresident…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Maverick Oil & Gas Co. v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Clark v. DennisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Spaulding v. PorterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Mills v. District Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Governor—Department of Industrial Development v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- OFFICE OF GOV'R-DEPT. OF INDUS. v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977