Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Bagley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1998No. S-96-662PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

INTRODUCTION

Barbara L. Wheeler brought a negligence action against Darrel Bagley for injuries she sustained while working as a ranch employee for Bagley. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict that found Wheeler to be 49 percent negligent and Bagley to be 51 percent negligent with respect to Wheeler’s injuries, and valued Wheeler’s damages at $40,000. After the trial court entered judgment in favor of Wheeler, Wheeler filed a motion for new trial on the basis that the jury had not been instructed as to the effect of the allocation of negligence, as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. §…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Roman v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Kaeo v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. BilottoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Reiser v. CoburnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Pleiss v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hartwig v. OREGON TRIAL EYE CLINICNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API