Legal Opinion

Fry v. Airline Pilots Ass'n, International

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1996No. Nos. 94-1509, 94-1523PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs/appellants, nine nonstriking pilots for United Airlines and six of their wives, brought suit against United and the Airline Pilots Association (“ALPA”)1 based on post-strike harassment of the nonstriking pilots. The district court granted United’s summary judgment motion on all claims because the claims were either preempted by the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-163,181-188, or barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Colorado Worker’s Compensation Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 8-40-101 to 8-47-209. The court also granted…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Robert Brown v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. George A. Schiltz v. Burlington Northern Railroad Transportation Communications UnionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Arnold v. Air Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'n v. Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API