Legal Opinion

George A. Schiltz v. Burlington Northern Railroad Transportation Communications Union

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1997No. 96-2810PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN M. REASONER, District Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court’s 2 granting summary judgment in favor of Ap-pellees Burlington Northern Railroad (BNR) and the Transportation Communications International Union (TCU), and against Appellant George Schiltz (Schütz). Schütz argues that the district court erred in: (1) determining that BNR had not discriminated against Schütz on the basis of age when it faüed to hire him for various jobs for which Schütz had applied; (2) determining that Schütz’s union seniority rights were based in the Northeastern District, Number 5, as opposed to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. William Grosjean v. First Energy Corporation Toledo Edison EnergyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. Carole M. HARTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISCONSIN BELL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Williams v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Robert Brown v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API