Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Dean
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 25, 1951No. 1018PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiff, Pearl Taylor, purchased at foreclosure sale a dwelling house owned by William B. and Florence V. Carroll, and thereafter brought suit against the Car-rolls for possession.1 After entry of judgment by default against the Carrolls, Samuel T. Dean and James E. Diggs were permitted to intervene and defend on the ground that they were subtenants of the Carrolls in possession of parts of the premises. After trial the court found in favor of the interveners, and plaintiff has appealed.
Several questions are raised as to the regularity of the intervention procedure,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beall v. EversonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Tamamian v. GabbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Vaughn v. NealDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Surratt v. Real Estate Exchange, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by9 opinions
- Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Talbert v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
- Uthus v. Valley Mill CampCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Davis v. Francis Scott Key Apartments, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Picking v. CarbonaroDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.