Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Neal

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1948No. 613PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

This was a suit for possession of a room in a rooming house, based on the charge that the tenant was disorderly in behavior, and was disorderly and was committing a nuisance by refusing to admit plaintiff for purposes of cleaning, papering and painting, and by refusing to furnish plaintiff a key to the room. There was a complete failure to prove disorderly behavior and so we are here concerned only with the latter charge.

Plaintiff operated a rooming house in which defendant had rented a furnished room. Just above the room there was an unoccupied attic to which access could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. TottenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  2. Nickel v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Beall v. EversonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. McSweeney v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Tamamian v. GabbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ortberg v. Goldman Sachs GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Jones v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Gibson Ex Rel. GibsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. McKnight v. Wire Properties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API