Legal Opinion

Micozzi v. Klysh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County granting the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in a trespass action arising out of a motor vehicle collision. The grant of a new trial is an inherent power and immemorial right of the trial court, and the appellate court will not disturb the exercise of that authority in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion: Gallihue v. Penn Fruit Co., 196 Pa. Superior Ct. 325, 175 A. 2d 96.

On April 24, 1958, about ten o’clock p.m., Albert B. Micozzi was the owner of a 1956 Oldsmobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Thomas v. TomaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. DENMAN v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Com. of Pa., Dept. of Hwys. v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Gallihue v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2004
  2. Lind v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API