Legal Opinion

Gallihue v. Penn Fruit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1961No. Appeal, No. 253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

On July 5, 1958, Mary A. Gallihue, a customer in a super-market operated by the Penn Fruit Company, was injured in one of the check-out aisles. She and her husband instituted a trespass action, the trial of which resulted in the following verdict by the jury: “Verdict for Mary A.. Gallihue in the sum of $2969.00 for loss of salary; and for Lester F. Gallihue in the sum of $312.00 for medical, x-rays and maid”. The court en banc subsequently granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and this appeal by the plaintiffs followed.

Access to the aisle in question was controlled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Salemmo v. DolanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Conard v. DuffySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doytek v. BOBTOWN R. AND G. CLUBSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Hunt v. Herman Pneumatic Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Micozzi v. KlyshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Mendel v. Waxbrown Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API